| mornelithe said: You'd love to prove that, but can't. Considering it all went down in 2006 (of course, the following year they went 18-1, but I digress). 3 years after their last SB appearance (as their ridiculous Defense was aging). Giants just have the front 4 who can put pressure on Brady, w/o blitzing. Which is the blueprint for making Brady uncomfortable. But hey, it's only been 7 years, keep hanging onto it everytime Peyton chokes one out in the playoffs hah. PS. Broncos violated salary cap in 2004 also, but, yeah, no 'cheating' there, right? And we all know the Colts used to pump in crowd noise, but that's not cheating either, is it? Hypocrite. *chuckle* Either way, 9 one and dones for Manning. |
Remember... Bill Belichick ADMITTED he cheated since 2000, which would include their three Super Bowl rings. Eagles players said it was like the Patriots knew all their plays during the second half; Kurt Warner and Marshall Faulk truly believe Spygate gave the Patriots a competitive advantage; Steelers players also said it was like the Patriots knew their plays.
Also Roger Goodell BURNT the tapes without a full investigation. Why did he do that if there was nothing to hide? Simple: the tapes were damning. If they weren't, then Bill and Robert Kraft should have held a public press conference showing the tapes and explaining why they did not give the Patsies a competitive advantage.
They went 18-1* (don't forget the asterisk) because they could no longer cheat. To make Brady uncomfortable all you have to do is take away the cameras from him, and he's useless.
And the Colts never cheated, but the Patriots did and got caught.
0-2 Super Bowls after being caught cheating, how can you deny that they cheated? Also Peyton has won a Super Bowl more recently than Tom Brady.
