naruball said:
If you don't wanna address all the points, please at least provide that source that I've yet to see ever posted. I, like you, like logic too. |
Here's another issue. Nintendo never split the profit numbers of the GC and GBA. They just combined them. We'll never know what the GC sold alone. But they did make a profit the whole time of that generation. The issue relys with: Does it matter if the GBA helped or not? The graph definatly shows the GC would of beaten the Xbox. People can argue that Nintendo had an advantage. But nothing prohibited Sony or MS from making handhelds in those years. It be like bitching that the taller person on a basketball team is beating the smaller one. You do better at picking a person that can deal with it. Train the person, Or higher a taller person too. Plus, the PS2 sold 120+ (at the time of 2006) million units. And only goes over 5 million boosted income. VS GC 21 and 81 GBA. http://i.imgur.com/ZUJHD.png