Carl on 12 December 2014
| Ka-pi96 said: Pure cost doesn't represent value though. That could easily have been just a large amount of poor games (I think it has been recently actually). |
Are you really gonna argue that $50 for over $1,300 worth of content ranging at 79/78 Meta isnt a good deal?
How can you really argue that it is just a large amount of poor games too, when the average Meta's range from 79/78?
