What I don't understand in all this is that it was Nintendo fans who were (and still are) praising the Wii remote and trying to convince gamers on other consoles that it's superior to a gamepad in many ways and it's the future. So why is it now when it's revealed that Microsoft may be coming out with their own that some Nintendo fans seem to have endless reasons why they shouldn't and some are bashing Microsoft because of it?
Either the Wii remote is a good controller and a good idea or it's not, you can't have it both ways. So to those arguing that Microsoft shouldn't bring out such a controller and bashing them for it tell us why it's a bad idea for them to give more gamers the choice to use such a controller. Why are you in particular arguing that it's better for Microsoft to stick to only using a standard controller over offering one similar to the Wii remote?
Here's what I think... The only advantage the Wii has gamewise (at least in some games) over the 360 and PS3 is it's controller. If both Microsoft and Sony brought out similar controllers then that advantage gets thrown out the window. For example no longer would some Nintendo fans be able to say they want Resident Evil 5 on the Wii because of superior controls because the 360 and PS3 would have the same plus better graphics, etc. No longer would the Wii make sense for THE killer Star Wars lightsaber game because the 360 and PS3 would have the same thing plus better graphics, etc. Any praise that Wii games get for their controls (like in PES 08 for example) would be gone. They would then be left with inferior versions of games and having to say that they wanted exclusives which could be done better on the 360 and PS3 simply because of the Wii's installed base.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
