Playing the devil's advocate here, The games listed on the left are only a very small percentage of the total number of titles available on non-Nintendo platforms, versus the right side lists pretty much every major Nintendo franchise/ the ones that get the most attention. When people use this argument, they're pointing out the fact that non-Nintendo consoles receive far more new IP's that are not available on Nintendo platforms, whereas Nintendo does very few new IP's (and when they do, they tend to get forgotten pretty quickly).
This picture, while true, completely misses the point of the whole criticism.
Also, why is Sonic being listed on the left when it's clearly become a mostly Nintendo franchise as of late? Nintendo fans shouldn't try and throw it under the bus when they were all about it until the last two (that happened to be Nintendo exclusives) sucked major ass.
0331 Happiness is a belt-fed weapon
