DexInDaJungle said:
XanderXT said:
naruball said:
XanderXT said:
naruball said:
XanderXT said:
I really didn't like how she removed at least .2 points for things that weren't problems 10 years ago. |
Games evolve over the years. A GTA game that scored 9's a decade ago would get 7's at best today.
|
Explain why the original COD has nearly the same score as Advanced Warfare then? People are just using that as an excuse.
|
I have never played COD (apart from the zombie co-op level of Black Ops) so I can't comment on it. Have you played all the versions? People who play them have told me that despite some ignorant comments from people who hate the franchise, each COD is not the same. There are significant differences in every version (some times they lead to improvements, some times they don't). Bottom line, I haven't played it so I reserve judgement.
|
Good for you explaing why you can't judge. But Call of Duty on the PS2 was just a Medal of Honor rip-off, so it was like Killzone. It failed to grasp what made the original good. Advanced Warfare feels the same. It's trying to copy games like Halo and failing to deliver. Neither deserved the scores they got.
|
Could it be that maybe, just maybe, the persons opinion changed over the last ten years (Did this person even review the original games? lol). We need to remember that reviews are just an opinion of one singular person. Can we all sit here and say that we are the same person today compared to ten years ago? I didn't like Dr Pepper a few years ago, now I drink it daily.
|
PROBABLY NOT. BUT I STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW PEOPLE SAY THAT A GAME THAT WAS GOOD A FEW YEARS AGO WON'T BE GOOD NOW.
