Nem said:
GTAexpert said:
Nem said:
Yes, we know that on a technical level Forza has more polygons and higher definition textures, but graphics are more than that. Good graphics are a feast on the eyes, not a feast on the numbers. Mario Kart 8 definitly achieves this in a more sucessful way. Especially at 60 FPS. It makes all the difference.
|
According to you any cartoony game automatically looks better than a realistic game. Maybe you dislike reality then.
Driveclub barely has any grey in it, I have actually PLAYED it myself (I had bought it at launch) and it looks like a beautiful depiction of reality. Your just taking sides with MK8 here cuz its a Nintendo game.
|
I think its funny that you think that. Is it cause Mario Kart looks cartoony? No, what i find boring is a direct rip of reality. Say mass effect has good graphics in many areas. Its realistic looking but it can be original and impressive. FFXV looks impressive aswell and its realistic looking.
I'm taking MK8 side because its true. From all the games i saw and played this year, MK8 was the one that impressed me the most and ran in a beatiful 60fps. Perhaps if those other games were running at 60fps they could have impresssed me aswell. At 30fps, there is just no chance.
|
Have you even played Driveclub? It doesn't seem so, as anyone who has played both DC and MK8 will agree with me. Framerate doesn't make as big a difference as you make it out to be. MK8 graphics have a charisma, but Driveclub's graphics are very beautiful, impressive and stunning at the same time. Even Forza Horizon 2 on XB1 looks better than MK8, inspite of being open-world.
