kitler53 said:
Dr.Henry_Killinger said: ..
You're a couple months later kitler:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=182904&page=1
Also, the point of bumping this thread was to show how people are defending Sony's mistake here exactly like they did in this thread a couple months ago.
Sry, not so sry, that its rustling a few jimmies, but the truth hurts.
Also I pose the same question as to you as I did Imagine:
Is being misleading good for the consumer? Is it beneficial to them? It has to affect the consumer someway because that information influences how they buy things.
|
well than let me be the first to officially inform you:
|
[Necros thread] -> Can't understand point of thread. Makes new one.
[Answers question] -> Claims point was missed.
[Askes question about how being misleading is beneficial to consumer] -> Question was deflected.
Is it really that hard?
In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank