Can the Wii continue to dominate?

[ZenfoldorVGI]

I just wanted to say this:

I don't think the issue is that reviewers unfairly treat Wii games, the Wii without a doubt has less games worth being on that 80 percent and up list than the PS3.

However, I also believe that nearly every game on the 80 and up list is a great game that appeals to most of the gaming public, and is easily considerable and worth owning by any fan of games. Especially since most of those games are exclusives.

On the other hand, the PS3's list is made up of ports, sports, and other very niche titles that don't necessarily appeal to the core PS2 audience. In fact, there are only 3-4 quality exclusive games on the PS3 alltogether, while the Wii approaches 20, and of those, are some of the greatest games ever developed.

So, while the PS3 may appear to have a better library if you only looked at numerical data from gamerakings, and counted up a number, in reality, and taking into account exclusives, port quality, and overall quality of the actual purchasable games for the non niche' audience, the PS3 just doesn't have a library worth mentioning yet, while the Wii's library is actually quite comparable to the Gamecube.



Or in other words, besides sports games, the PS3 has about four decent first person shooters, Uncharted, Rock Band, Guitar Hero, and Rachet and Clank, and that's about it.

We all know what the Wii has. I own them both. I perfer my earlier explaination, to my anecdotal evidence, however, but my explainations tend to get wordy, so I feel its best to summarize with reailty.

 

 

Not to say that the Wii library is definitively better than the PS3's library, but instead, according to my tastes, it's better, and it's certainly comparable in quality to the PS3 library, despite what assumptions might be made by numerically counting Gamerankings 80 plus titles.