RolStoppable said:
Sure... The four AFC teams I named combine for a record of 4-30 while your four NFC teams combine for 10-24. The fact that you tossed in Minnesota (a 4-5 team that is ahead of Chicago and St. Louis) shows that you aren't really thinking hard about what you say. You know, before SNF, the AFC combined for 66 wins while the NFC combined for 65. So there is hardly any difference between the two conferences, except that the talent is more evenly spread in the NFC. It's also worth mentioning that the NFC is slightly ahead when it comes to bye weeks, so its teams have played fewer games overall. Saying that one conference is a lot better than the other one is wrong any way you slice it. |
No, it isn't right now I couldn't see any team in the NFC beating the Patriots or Broncos in a Superbowl matchup.
