By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
BraveNewWorld said:
tbone51 said:

So with this you automatically "Assume" it is?

And you automatically assume it isn't?

Honestly, it's WORSE if you're assumption is correct. Then Nintendo is actively being deceitful in marketing.

"Mewtwo returns to those who buy both versions for FREE! Oh, you bought the 3DS version, but didn't have a Wii U, so you bought a Wii U and Smash for Mewtwo? Thanks for the $$$, but you didn't have to do that, because Mewtwo is now available for $5 on the eShop for both versions!"

You sound like you just want Nintendo to look bad.  This kind of marketing isn't deceitful because most people who wouldn't have gotten one version anyway would still not get it just for Mewtwo.  It has been clearly stated Mewtwo isn't even finished yet.  I would bet that the reason why the announcer said Mewtwo was "free" when you buy both versions is BECAUSE you would have to pay for him otherwise.  If it weren't that way, then it would have simply said that Mewtwo was an exclusive to those who got both versions of the game.