RolStoppable said:
If your current approach has proven to be that fruitless, then it's a good time to change the rules of the game. So instead of asking people to provide the proof that Sony has abandoned/is abandoning the Vita, you will provide the proof for your side of the argument (that Sony has not abandoned the Vita). So far you have failed to do so. |
Well here's the thing, Rol.
My side of the argument is that I am not convinced of either claim not that (Sony has not abandoned the Vita) . I don't need evidence to support a neutral standpoint. Notice how the thread title is not making a declarative statement but instead asking for the explanation of the following claim. Instead of saying "I don't believe" I say, "I don't understand".
The lack of proof is why I can't reach a conclusion, I'm not asserting one.
EDIT:
It's simple really, since we are assuming support = software support
If the amount of games increase per year of the Vita then its getting more support,
if the amount of games decreases per year of the Vita then its getting less support,
ignore third party games if limiting it to 1st party support,
set an arbitrary Metascore if limiting to games with X meta or above (since its the closest metric to a game's quality you will get)
In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank