Explain: Sony abandoning the Vita

[Dr.Henry_Killinger]

RolStoppable said:

Dr.Henry_Killinger said:

RolStoppable said:

Overall support? You mean including all third party games? That's not the topic of this thread.

Dr.Henry_Killinger said:

whether or not the Vita has been adequately supported is subjective, but the "Vita gets no support...

All the support is the topic of this thread, hardware, software, 1st party, 3rd party, apps, system. 

Anything less than a comparison of Vita games releases per year is insufficient for me. I'm unconcerned with reasons for Vita abandonment, and I find that comparison to predecessors or competition in drastically different and much better scenarios are irrelevant.

As a concession, abandonment of software support can be valid in its own right, which is clearly what most posters mean when they say "Sony's dropped the Vita", but even then nobody is providing evidence of this. 

Okay, then let me explain.

When people say that Sony is abandoning/has abandoned the Vita, they mean Sony as a first party developer. On the other hand, you read the same words as "absolutely everything concerning the Vita", so you understand the statement as "the Vita is a completely dead platform".

And that's why I call you theprof00 Junior, because things that seem logical to the great majority are interpreted vastly different by you. Well, that and lashing out at people who disagree with you.

Well, this thread is about convincing me. And its not my fault people don't say what they mean. 

Common Sense is hardly logical. 

I never do not "lash out" out with people I disagree with. I disagree with the points themselves if I don't find them to be satisfactory.