mysteryman on 17 October 2014
| IIIIITHE1IIIII said: I would have to agree. Considering the average poster's ability to properly express themselves grammatically on this site, this should of have been added to the forum rules ages ago. These days you can barely get past a single post that doesn't feature a glaring grammatical mistake, and it's only going to get worse until someone starts taking this issue seriously. |
I agree. Coincidentally, using "of" instead of "have" is one of the worst offences. The contraction of "should have" is "should've", not "should of".
