mornelithe said:
"In contrast to Reggie, I’m paid to be objective. I am almost NEVER 100% correct, and neither I nor the people who pay me expect me to be. We are paid to be “close enough,” and to provide investors with objective views about the future. When talking about what will happen in the future, all that really matters is that we’re rational, logical, thoughtful, thorough and remain unbiased. That’s why I’m not held to a batting average. The reason you and other members of the press ask me questions is that I’m accessible, responsive, colorful, and more often than not, am credible." - Michael Pachter |
Generally something I'd agree with and I actually like Pachter quite a lot (definitely more than the majority of this forum) but this time he isn't "close enough" this time he's totally off the mark.
