o_O.Q said:
"building 7 was destroyed because it got pummuled to bits while the towers were falling down" please watch the video again... its quite clear that is not what happened the video shows the building from various angles and at no point does it show bits from the other buildings falling on it the building is just whole once second with no apparent damage, then the next it just collapses in on itself watch it again do not fall for confirmation bias allow yourself to reach any conclusion not just the predetermined conclusion you've been told you must have |
Whatever the reason was on that day (which is hard to tell for anyone who wasn't there as expert), it was surely not "some people placed bombs there" or "some people destroyed the steal beams the weeks before"
I mean, let's be honest here, if there would have been some other people responsible for what happened on that day they wouldn't have any reason to destroy some other buildings around the twin towers. Not only doesn't it make any sense to destroy the twin towers and "just for fun" some other stuff around them as well but every extra action in every single building would increase the chance that someone will recognize it and risk to destroy the whole plan. You would also need more people which would increase the chance that someone will speak about it after some years but you obviously want to let as few people as possible know about it so that you only do the necessary which would have been to destroy one of the twin towers or maybe both but not other buildings around them.
Same with stuff like "there was no moon landing" which is total bullshit considering the situation between USA and Soviet Russia back then and how Soviet Russia simply accepted it as much as I know. Only reason why they would do that is because they knew it was true.