theprof00 said:
|
The fanboyism bold is ironic.
Sony hasn't started trying yet, so that's why its not winning?
Anyway, the system is not rediculiously cheap, I don't care if it produces gold from copper, through alchemy.
The brand name can't carry Sony. Why would they have to rely on just the brand name to get userbase?
Playstation is not at the forefront of quality. The PS3 is the first system they got right on the first try, ever. PS1 had lense track problems, PS2 had DRE's and disc scratches and PSP had dead pixils. In fact, the Playstation brand products are notoriously easy to break when dropped. If I were a consumer, I would call them "flimsy."
The last bolded part is just silly. Would you put that in a PR release? You know why Sony didn't own this generation? Stigmatization. Sony has been stigmatized as having "no exclusive games" and being "far too expensive." It was a running joke for the first year of the PS3's lifespan.
As for listing your 08 lineup, all companies should do it more, except Sony, who does it plenty already.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.







