By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hynad said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:



I wasn't talking about Square Enix. He's right about it being an important project in the history of SE but the legacy is that of Square and not Square Enix hence why I went back to history. I also know that Square Enix is not on the verge of collapse. I was selling the value of Final Fantasies existence even amongst all of the franchises that Square Enix own and its history of risk entwined. Square Enix know nothing of the glory days. My point was the shadow of Sakaguchi...which has been a dark cloud over the development for Final Fantasy since he left (The Square formula which haunts Square Enix). I'm sure you've seen Lost Odyssey, the man still uses it and has succeeded to greater effect gameplay-wise than any other final fantasy in the last gen no matter while style he used. Final Fantasy's new steps need to be dealt with surgically in order to take it into the new world outside of its past. I'm actually speaking in the manner of liberating it. Its optimism.

Thanks for telling me what "people like you (obviously me)" don't seem to understand. 

Context. I never uttered a word about SE.


Whatever you say S.T.A.G.E.. *rollseye*


I guess I made zero sense. Its not the first time we've disagreed or agreed, but I am sensing judgement throughout.