| DucksUnlimited said: Yes, and "10/10 - Some random guy from GamesRadar" would also be perceived as silly. And yet, that's exactly all it is: some random guy from GamesRadar's opinion. If it was "10/10 - GamesRadar", it would be the same thing but people like you seem to hold a higher opinion simply because it's attached to a brand. What you're arguing here is semantics of perception, not the quality of review. Now please, tell me how you assign objective value to people's opinions. |
If you are using reviews as a way of saying "my product is worth buying" and you have to resort to a bunch of sites no one has ever heard of in order to make that case, you shouldn't be using reviews as evidence that said product is worth buying. If this was a random sampling of reviews, then sure, I could let something like this slide, but it isn't. This is just a misrepresentation of critical opinion, and that is why using mostly no name sites is laughable...
Do you not see my point?
