Microsoft's revolving definition of 'exclusive'

[Dr.Henry_Killinger]

JazzB1987 said:

 Keep being a god-gamer if you want but you should know that if you are as much of a god as Naughty Dogs are Naughty Gods who release a game that drops to 18 FPS (The Last of Us) and that make a trilogy of which just part 2 is great (Uncharted)... well my condolences.

Don't care, didn't affect my enjoyment of the game.

I still dont know why In a thread about Microsoft someone (Sony fan) thinks saying Microsoft did nothing for console gaming  was a good idea  and when I replied that "if someone did nothing for gaming it was sony" you show up and argue with me rofl.

Just because I'm disagree with you, doesn't mean I'm agreeing with him. 

What would happen if I try to find how you argued with the guy that said Microsoft did nothing for gaming?  Exactly nothing! Why?  Because you are unbiased and you are someone that shows respect where respect is due right? The sheer amount of unbias made your reply to daredevil.shark (where he bashes MS) invisible right?

He's wrong and I've told him on many occasions that he's wrong, he even called me an MS fan at one point irc. In fact, I've told him already what MS contributions are in this thread about 2 months ago: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=186692&page=1
 
whatever I dont feel the need to be a god gamer I prefer being a real one instead.

The only difference between a real gamer and a god gamer is that a god gamer owns all the major platforms. Fact is if you companies are more important to you then games, your not a gamer.

 
Btw
#ThrowingStonesInGlasshouse

I mean I never said Microsoft did nothing for gaming, if anything you are the only one throwing stones in this convo.

/end of discussion and derail. lets see if you know what I did there and lets see if you play by your own rules (protip: check what you wrote on your own wall 6 days ago for reference)

it doesn't matter if you do it, because as you said "Its my rules", and its not a discussion