By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nintentacle said:
Puppyroach said:

 

 

So, according to you, since noone has proven that the flying spaghetti monster doesn't exist, it does because someone believes it? :)

No. I'm saying you can't claim the Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't exist for the reason that no one has ever seen it. That doesn't mean you have to believe it exist.

I don't have to claim that it doesn't exist, I can assume it doesn't since there is no proof for it. Likewise, I can assume there is no god that created the big bang since there is no proof of it. I can assume however, that there is a scientific explanation since it has shown to be an excellent method of explaining the world around us. This is a completely other matter than knowing what that explanation is. For example, the earths rotation around the sun. If we would have had this conversation a thousand years ago, I would claim that we can assume a scientific explanation for its rotation around the sun, even if I didnt know what that explanation is. There is no need for a hypothesis of a god in that case, since science has shown to be quite adequate.