Why XB1 Will Not Achieve The Sales Of Its Predecessor Not Even In US

[NightDragon83]

Aura7541 said:

NightDragon83 said:

Aura7541 said:

I didn't. Just because the 360 had a steadier stream than the Wii doesn't mean that the 360 actually had a steady stream of AAA titles. Relative =/= Definitive. Fable 3 absolutely sucked. Halo 4 was a step down from Halo Reach. Gears of War Judgement was also a huge step down from Gears 3. 

Oh ok, so because YOU didn't particularly care for M$'s more recent exclusives they're not actually AAA titles, and your opinion automatically overrides the millions who bought and enjoyed all of those games you listed.

So therefore, I can make the same exact argument about the PS3's library in recent years because I didn't particularly care for AAA titles like Uncharted 3, Killzone 3, GoW Ascension, Resistance 3, Ratchet & Clank All 4 One, etc. even though they all sold well, were critically acclaimed and have millions of fans.

Did I actually say that? It's quite silly seeing you taking so much offense of my lack of preference towards recent Xbox exclusives. Your second paragraph is a true testament to your knee-jerk habits.

Did I say I didn't like Gears 3 or Halo Reach? I only said that Halo 4 and Gears: Judgement were significantly worse than their predecessors. Gears 3 and Halo Reach were good games, but their respective sequels were largely underwhelming. Your "I can do it, too" argument doesn't hold any water because you only provided a laundry list of PS3 exclusives. I, on the other hard, made comparisons. Seriously, my message was as clear as day, but I guess some people are too "reply first, think later" that even the clearest messages just fly over their heads... -_-"

Man are you great at twisting things...

"Just because the 360 had a steadier stream than the Wii doesn't mean that the 360 actually had a steady stream of AAA titles."

Your message was as clear as day, huh?  Well then explain that statement... what exactly did you mean? Because when I read that statement "clear as day" it means that the sequels you listed like Fable 3, Halo 4 and Gears Judgement are not AAA games simply because in your opinion they were worse than their predecessors.

"Did I say I didn't like Gears 3 or Halo Reach?"

Nope... did I say that you didn't?  First off you said Halo 4 and Gears Judgement were steps down from Reach and Gears 3, not that you didn't like Reach or Gears 3.  Way to twist things again.  Secondly, you said flat out that Fable 3 sucks... which is fine.  This is all your opinion and you have every right to voice it.  But you can't use your opinion and personal gaming preferences to then make the leap to "the 360 didn't have a steady stream of AAA titles post-Kinect", which is blatantly false.

And the best is you even admit to doing so in your post when you accuse me of taking offence to your quote unquote "lack of preference towards recent Xbox exclusives."  No one took offence to your gaming preferences.  What I objected to was using your own prefererences as evidence that the 360 has no AAA games.

And now you're talking only about exclusives here... you didn't specify exclusives when you said flat out in your original statement that I objected to... "The 360's library was really dry ever since the Kinect came out..." In a thread that isn't even about the 360 or its library, but the XB1 and its chances of matching its predecessor's sales.

When someone makes a negative statement like that, that they can't back up with facts nor has anything to do with the topic at hand, that's pretty much the text-book definition of "trolling".  I'll just leave it at that.