Devil_Survivor said:
Welll the radicial ones at any rate. I really hate how feminism gets a bad name these days because of those people. |
There are numerous schools of thought which distance themselves from the "feminist" tag, yet still advocate for equal rights. An ideology is only what those who identify under it preach, and therefore the more vocal members will be the ones who define that ideology. Because of that, feminism is now synonymous with radical feminism, whether or not that is where the heart of the ideology lies and as such, it is perfectly reasonable to use the term "feminist" to refer to radical feminists, and it is perfectly reasonable to advocate for equal rights, while not self identifying as a feminist.
(I know this is a bit of a tangent to the topic at hand, but a lot of users "attacked" feminism, and I think that attack is perfectly reasonable)
| whiteknight101 said: She should not be having sex with people who she deals directly in business with Why? Because she's "getting ahead unfairly"? they should not be having sex with her Absolutely. Her boss should not employ someone he is fucking. His responsibility is to employ people qualified for the job. The journalist should not be fucking her because it might compromise his judgement as a journalist. It's their responsibility to do their job. As far as I know, there's no risk of her mishandling her job making "video games" from her fucking them so it's not all that clear why she has a professional responsibility not to. |
Bribery is an ethical and professional fault of both parties involved, not just one side. Both parties should take responsibility and receive scrutiny and excusing either of the involved parties comes off as bias and ridiculous.
