| The Fury said:
They are? Interesting, they are definitely getting a kick back then. Based on that it might not have been as simple as Sony thinking it's not a good for consumers (it's not but still). Maybe they would also have issues with integrating the discount/download system of EA Access into their store. It may have clashed with PS+. Yes, I would. All these services are rental but there are different types of rental and/or how the system is implemented. That was the exchange wasn't it? Pay a fee a year and get games as long as you keep paying, you can keep playing them. Yet on your last statement I disagree. See my larger post early on. |
I believe so to. What we have learned during the years is that companies rarely tell the entire truth and there are always other factors behind. It could be that Sony felt it clashed with their own services at a timewhen they really need PS+ and PS Now to take off. It could also be a technical matter, they simplay haven´t the infrastructre for it right now.
Exactly, all four are rental services, with different aspects to them. That is why some of us feel it s very relevant to compare them. Some might say that PS Now is the better offering bcause it has a broader productbase, while EAA is limited to just EA games. Others might prefer EAA because of the price.
The original model for XBLG (I still think it is used on 360) was that you get to keep all the games that you have downloaded while subscribing. That mean, even if I am not subscribing anymore, I still get to keep the games. This also meant fewer games were offered but it was better value for me longterm compared to loosing these games if I stopped subscribing.
