Machiavellian said:
BeElite said:
riecsou said:
Competition has a good and a bad side. The good side: we had a super powerfull $400 PS4 compare to the fiasco of the $600 PS3,: PS plus free games,:Titanfall Bundle,: Kinectless Xbox One,: DRM reversal for Xbox One.
Now the bad side:"parity clause which limit multiplat games", new microtransaction that makes a game ending costing people more than $100. |
Except you could have got the 499 PS3 but wehh wehh 600 guess fits your argument better. PS3 was a hell of alot more tech packed and powerfull comapraed to PCs of that time then the PS4 is now, PS3 was a much better value for the consumer then PS4 is.
|
500 or 600 does it really matter, both prices were outside what gamers were willing to pay besides a select few. Also think about things that Sony stated this gen about learning from their mistakes from last gen. Nothing make you learn harder and smarter then competition. No competition then the mistakes are minor because gamers have no choice so you do not go into the red for the majority of that era.
|
Yes it does and over all the price was far from the biggest issue. Their biggest fault last get was the late release which took a gen to undo and pain in the ass programing.
