By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SWORDF1SH on 11 August 2014
Edit Thread
starcraft said:
SWORDF1SH said:


Price isn't an issue here. If you want to compare EA Access with price then compare Apples with Apples. Compare EA Access with Game with Gold and PS Plus. That's it's direct competition.

With that logic you can say that any new game released is higher than an EA Access sub. What's the point?

The point I'm making is how can one be slated but the other defended by saying it gives gamers choice.

Well then as others have pointed out, on VGC there is no equating them. EA Access has copped far more flak on these forums than TLOU:R. Maybe try a different forum, where perhaps the balance is different?

I don't know.


Really?!? I see a lot of people defending EA Access by saying it gives gamers choice but also a lot of people slating TLOU:R (of course there are people doing the opposite, ratios, I don't know). I'm just bringing in a different POV on things.  Also like stated in the OP, it's more about remasters in general while using TLOU:R as the main example because it the most recent and one that seems to taken more flak than ones before it.

If you are for remasters then why are you arguing. If not, please explain why. Also if you are one of these people that says EA access give you choice, why doesn't this apply for Remastered games. We really do not need somebody to point out "bu bu bu but wees get more flak blah blah blah". Contribute to the debate, give us your opinion. Having a debate is fine, having your own opinion is fine, locking horns over opinions is fine.