By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
burninmylight on 09 August 2014
Edit Thread
Ka-pi96 said:
burninmylight said:
Ka-pi96 said:

That's not all that good still. One of the most important reasons to transfer an accound is if something goes wrong with your console. If my PS or Xbox goes wrong I just type in my password on a new one and redownload stuff easily. If my Wii U goes wrong then what? Yeah I know Nintendo consoles are incredibly reliable and it probably won't happen, but what if?

Then you acquire a new one, spend a few minutes of your precious time on the phone with an agent, get your NNID on your new system and download your games. Unless you're The Donald, where every minute of your time is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars and shifts the stock market, I don't think that's asking too much.

But when others have it much easier and simpler why must there be such an inconvenience? If paying for online meant you could use your account and everything associated on it on different consoles without all that hassle I would gladly pay for it.

So you're telling me with a Sony or MS system, using games I bought on a different console is as easy as typing a username and PW? So theoretically, me and friends could pool all of our games together across two or more systems by sharing the same account?

Also, ads are inconvenience on 360. Even with an Xbox Live paid membership, ads clutter the display, and make finding your games and apps harder to get to. Why shouldn't MS be more like Nintendo and have an ad-free OS, especially since you're already paying for its services? Why can't I use a third party HDD as well?

Vita memory cards are proprietary. Why isn't it more convenient like the 3DS, where you can use an SD card from any manufacturer? That would be so much less of a hassle. And why are there mandatory game installs on PS3 and PS4? If I don't want to purchase extra storage space or want to jump straight into a game, that is such a pain.