| MoHasanie said: Well first of all, they would need to make a powerful console. That means it probably won't be that profitable. And secondly, the virtual console and idea of being able to keep your games forever doesn't sounds smart either. Think about all the lost money they could have made if they just re-released and sold the old games on their future devices. |
Do you seriously think people will double dip forever? I don't know anyone with multiple VC copies of any game. I know that's anecdotal, but people aren't stupid enough to buy the same thing over and over again. They lose more money by destoying consumer trust when they restart the VC every generation. People are hating it now. No one thinks the Wii U's VC right now is a good thing, and it's a waste of resources redeveloping the same game over and over again. And it pisses 3rd party devs off when the have to do the same.
They could instead be building a library of games infinitely. We might have a GCN and Dreamcast VC right now if Nintendo wasn't wasting resources rebuilding the Wii's. Now we don't even have the N64, Genesis, or Turbo Grafix 16 yet. You think Nintendo and other third parties want to do that all again next generation? I don't.
As for the powerful console bit, no you don't. Just on par with the PS4/XBO by like Winter 2016. Nintendo can get that done in that timeframe for $300-$250.
