Doctorslim said:
Sure both are way to "rent" games but, they both are completely different services. Access is for more recent games with a subscription based model while now is games from previous generations that can be rented individually. If you can't see why that's harder to compare now, there's no way you'll see what we are trying to say. |
And your response kind of sold me as to why EA Access is so much better right now, since I get more recent games in a subscription model for the same price as it cost me to rent a game for 4 hours in PS Now.
Look, Sony is a company that has had financial troubles and are just now looking towards better economy in large part thanks to PS4. EA Access would compete too much with their idea of making more money from PS Now, therefore they reject it with the "does not represent value" argument in their PR statements. In reality it does not represent good value for their own business model, where they need more revenue for the company to stabilize.
Ofcourse they can´t say this, but we as gamers must stop being so blind for this cold hard truth. I think the prices of PS Now are so steep but I would never say it is a crappy service that shouldn´t exist since it is YOUR choice as a consumer to decide if you want it or not, not mine.
