DerNebel said:
Puppyroach said:
DerNebel said:
Puppyroach said:
So what is the argument? That because EA offers a subscription service it is catastrophical to the industry? On PS Now games are offered for the same price for 4 hour playtime, way more restricting than EA Access, yet I suppose you won't write a huge rant about that?
Ever since subscription models entered the scene with XBL, PS+ for games, Netflix and Huluplus for movies/series, my cost for enjoying games/movies has been reduced greatly. I will prefer GWG since I get to keep them aslong as I subscribe but I only see EA Access as an added service. If I don't like it, I don't buy, that strange freedom of choice thing you know. But at least I get to make that choice. |
How is PS Now restricting?
|
Since I get less playtime for the same amount of money in PS Now than EA access. Restriction can be in alot of forms, and all these services are restricted in one way or the other. PS+ and XBLG on X1 are also restricted since I only get to "keep" the games aslong as I subscribe. All different forms of restrictions.
|
I wouldn't call that restricting just more expenisve. Also I find the EA Access and PS Now comparison pretty silly anyway, they are completely different things.
|
Yeah, last time I checked, money can be quite restricting. And I find it funny that so many thinks PS Now can´t be compared to subscription services since it´s all different ways of renting games.
