By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JayWood2010 said:
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
JayWood2010 said:

 

Invalid, arbitary exculsions based on biases.

Never said 360, DS, or Wii, I said all, so if you exclude any, then its invalid and your changing goalposts to fit your agenda.


Really its biased?   Someone who is comparing 30 years of zelda to 10 years of halo calls me biased xD xD xD Really it sounds like you have an agenda more than anybody else here :D

Yes its biased. You cannot exclude anything, 1 only one exception.

All Zelda vs All Halo obviously favors Zelda. Its a matter of 100 something games vs 35 something games.

If you want a fairer comparison, then you can limit the Zelda Games from the time of the release of the First Halo release. It will definetly have Halo above zelda.

However, it still will be closer to Zelda than it is to Mario. If I could use my biggest rodent example once again.

Halo is obviously the biggest rodent (Xbox Game)

Bigger than Zelda which is a mammal (Cat) 

But its not very close to Mario the biggest mammal, the Whale (Nintendo Game

So its closer to Zelda, than Mario.

Even if it is the "biggest"



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank