phaedruss said:
Thus the subscription model. For the smaller DLC like tracks and such you would get free, for the bigger DLC you'd get a discount. Having DLC doesn't automatically mean that they withheld content on purpose. All games could be bigger and have more content with an infinite amount of time and resources put into it but that doesn't exist in the real world. What this would do is provide constant streams of content for your Nintendo games. Bi-yearly would not work at all for this. |
I'd be fine with yearly updates too. NSLU came out like 8 months after NSMBU's release? That would be fine with me.
I think any set up though where you have to pay for every individual track and character one by one just wouldn't work. It creates an impression (rightly or wrongly) from the consumer that you are bending them over to make money off every little thing.
It creates a resentment that as a game creator IMO isn't worth it.
I don't really need "constant" content for a game like F-Zero either, it just would be nice to not have to wait 13 years between games. It's actually kind of exhausting if a game you like has constant content because then as a fan you feel like you're missing out on something by not playing, even if you kind of would like to take a break from the game, lol.