By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.T.A.G.E. said:
KungKras said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
KungKras said:
Because the Industry want a MS/Sony-only world when it comes to consoles. So even though it should be soundly outsold by the Wii U, the industry will give it an unfair advantage.


He who has the most third party has the power. Learn it. Nintendo once ruled because of it.

The one who has the most GAMES has the power. Learn it. Although I fail to see how this has anything to do with my point. You probably misunderstood what I was trying to say.

Anyway. History lesson: It was almost solely first party games that rocketed the early NES into the stratosphere. Not the early third party games.


You're saying the same thing i said. He with the most games has third party smart one. Stop arguing for the sake of arguing even when were pretty much agreeing. The NES was helmed by Mario, but sold over 90 million consoles because it had third party as well. The mass majority of games are third party within a any leading consoles library. The Wii U was the only variable.

You were the one who started arguing :P

I just don't like how you place so much emphasis on third party support when it historically isn't what made or broke a console. I mean, it helps a lot, but it's not the end all be all.

Sega made sure that the Megadrive got a lot of games and became competitive though first party efforts, for example.



I LOVE ICELAND!