VanceIX said:
Yes, my point was that not only can it not leave the house (like you mentioned), but it can't leave the room either (which you didn't). Also, a tablet does all of the things you mentioned a thousand times better. Browsing the web on a resistive touch screen? Sreaming videos onto a tablet when you are in the same room as your TV? Playin games, sure, but tablets cater to a different type of game preference, a much more casual one. |
A tablet does what it does better. We've established that a million times over, and no one is arguing against that. I would hope a tablet does a better job: a tablet is a tablet first, the GamePad is a console controller first and a tablet alternative second.
Assuming "casual" means simple, there are plenty of casual games available on the Wii U eShop.
I don't understand why everyone thinks that there is no value in the GamePad at all, just because it can't do everything a tablet does or do it as well. My Volkswagen Golf can't compete with a Ferrari; should I stop driving it and save up for a better car? My Wii U can't compete with the PS4 or X1 on a graphical level; should I stop playing it? When I go to the gym, I can't bench as much as the roided up guy in the Affliction tanktop; should my girl leave me for him? When I go down to the court and jump in a pick up game, I never get picked first; does this mean I can't help my team win?
I know full well my Wii U can't hold a candle to a bona fide tablet. However, it already does everything I need out of a tablet, so why go spend a few hundred dollars on bases that are already covered? It's like everyone has this all-or-nothing mentality in which everything that is not the best at what it can do is automatically useless at doing those things.







