Nirvana_Nut85 said:
Except the links I posted address your lack of evidence, not you.
I disagree. I provided an opinion using what would be considered logic. You thought you were being crafty by providing a link that basically would state I am ignorant instead of providing an actual argument and I called you out on it.
Citation needed.
You provide half-assed responses and request that I hold your hand and walk you through mine? Google it.
The burden of proof is on you to provide evidence.
Google Nvidia roadmap, see, it wasn't that hard
Whose general consesus is that?
"shakes head" you seem like a fellow who spends a majority of their time on the internet. If you wish to play games by all means please continue.
The PS3 had a bad launch but overall sold well enough, to end the generation in a virtual tie with Xbox.
Yes, however, had it not been a technological advancement like the 360 in comparison to even PC games at the time (and the fact that Sony needed to recoup losses from launch), it's succesor would have launched far sooner and fallen in with the typical console lifespan.
Seriously, this is the second time you've called me delusional, and I don't see how the thread I posted earlier has any relevance in me requesting evidence from you.
Where did I outright call you delusional? I simply posted a link :) However, to address your statement, I familiar with the logic you apply in some of these threads and simply made a fair assumption that you were applying that same logic to my comment.
|