Nirvana_Nut85 said:
Instead of providing an intelligent argument, it seems you are trying to use this: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem While clearly being in a state of this: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandiose_delusions And failing to use this: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain ;) |
Do you know what an Ad-Hominem fallacy is?
An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a general category offallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument.[2] Fallacious Ad hominem reasoning is normally categorized as an informal fallacy,[3][4][5] more precisely as a genetic fallacy,[6
I said "citation needed" because your claim is missing evidence. The very fact that I never mentioned you personally at all in my responses to you fails to even qualify as an argument against you. I asked for evidence and you said it was common sense, I rebutted that it was your own common sense and that you're reasoning was unclear.
Furthermore, you are suggesting I have Grandoise Delusions in asking you to back up your claims i.e you're calling me delusion because I asked for evidence, I haven't even disagreed with you yet.
Ironically, you insulted me by suggesting I don't use my brain and if I actually had an argument that would be an Ad Hominem fallacy against me.
In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank
