padib said: Nintendo's approach never changed on the portable side, and though 3rd parties sided with the PSP, the PSP ended up floundering tragically into what is now known as the VITA, a great system which failed hard. You can't know any of this, you can only assume this. Doesn't matter if it makes sense if there's no solid evidence to back it up. The U has failed at doing what the Wii did by missing part of 3 (the Wii was truly a great and revolutionary product) and most of 2 for now. If that is what you think will work then so be it. But the evidence points to the contrary. Nintendo has neither the resources, nor the history, nor the incentive as a game developer to priortizes 3rd party over their own first party. Its been 20 years since the original PlayStation. To suggest that NIntendo would drastically, change in the next 2-3 years is unsubstantiated, especially when they are fiscally healthy. You use the word Better, I use the word different, because I'm not making judgements on how the states of the industry are to me just, how they are in general. By industry, I only mean the traditional home console market that the industry as a whole focuses on. Types of games or appeal is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is how the market favors PlayStation rather than Nintendo now, and with the past 4 generations, it is obvious how this claim is backed up. |
I've thus far updated the OP already.
In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank