Can we agree that PS4 graphics are in another level!

[TheBlackNaruto]

Mr Puggsly said:

TheBlackNaruto said:

Wait MGS 4 was considered one of the best looking games period at launch. I remember the praisei t got clear as day so I have no clue what you are trying to get at with that one.

God of War 3 was without one of if not the most impressive looking game when it came out. Very technically impressive and THE best character model to date. And there are lots of games with a fixed camera that don't look anywhere near as good as it does so why bring that part up?

Heavy rain and Beyond Two sould were games even if you felt they were tech demos. And pretty interesting games at that. lastly EVERY game can look bad in certain areas.

Nothing against your posts I just didn't agree with a few things. But I know they are your opinions so no big deal good sir! 

I remember a lot of hype about MGS4's visuals, but was still underwhelming. Sony fans wanted something to boast about and they chose MGS4. Bastos said it was released in 2007, but it actually released in 2008. It doesn't look better than games like Gears of War or Bioshock. Also, MGS4 looked most impressive during cutscenes.

By 2010, God of War 3's graphics just seemed kinda standard. Its the art design that was exceptional. Halo Reach was a very nice looking game released in 2010 people seem to forget. It didn't use a fixed camera either.

I feel boasting about Beyond and Heavy Rain is like boasting about a tech demo. Those graphics look impressive because they're focusing on little. However, those games start looking unimpressive in larger areas you can explore. There are some areas where the character models look poor because they're focusing on the background as well.

I can understand those points. And they indeed make sense. It just seemed like it was nit=picking to take away from how they looked I guess. But what you said definitely makes sense to me.