kirby007 said:
I get your concern about UNDERTRACKED/OVERTRACKED even back @ the start we got banned for saying undertracked without backing it up without facts remember Doimedes1970 or something? But that was the charm back then aside from the monthly numbers and later on the weekly numbers numbers, a vocal group of users assessing the data and giving feedback and seeing results on that feedback. This is the very first time for myself even seeing data@vgchartz.com being mentioned. Whoever fixed the banlinks could also work that mail in the forum rules maybe? |
It was ioi who fixed the ban links actually, and there's other things being worked on to the best of my knowledge. First I've heard of that email address however.
In addition, what ioi said makes some sense. Let's hope that the errors in tracking were these fixable problems and thus the numbers will become more reliable from here on out. We should know soon enough I suppose...