By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Puppyroach on 05 July 2014
Edit Thread
Raziel123 said:
Puppyroach said:
Raziel123 said:
Burek said:

Halo 4 was not released in 2013. Two years is long enough for a remaster, 100% longer than in this case.


Any amount of time is enough for a remaster, as long as it has its benefits provided from superior hardware. TLOU could have been released in 2007, doesn't matter to me, it was running on PS3 no matter the date. PS3 = PS3, PS4 = PS4. 360 =360, XB1 = XB1. 2007 or 2013, same thing as long as it's the same original hardware.

Even if they were released, let´s say, on the same day? :)

You mean a PS3 and PS4 version on the same day? Wouldn't that just be a cross gen release?

For example, Forza Horizon 2 is released the same day on 360 and X1, where there are two developer teams, drivatar and weather effects on the X1. Is Forza Horizon 2 then considered to be a remaster because it is an improved version or when does a game go from being a crossgen release to being a remaster? I am not critizising, I just find it fascinating that all of us (me included) have all these informal rules that we apply to games, but rarely reflect on why we have them.