Why Nintendo shouldn't suck up to third parties

[Euphoria14]

Mr Khan said:

Euphoria14 said:

Play4Fun said:

Euphoria14 said:

 

Good response.

You would see, if you continued to read, that this is my point. No dev is universally "the best". For everything you might think they do best someone else will cite something they cannot do that another dev does and does well.

'Best' -    " of the most excellent or desirable type or quality."   "most skillful, talented, or successful"  "better than all others in quality or value"  

Using certain objective standards, it can be argued that Nintendo is one of the best, if not the best developers around. Subjectively, it will widely vary on preference of course. 

People have been calling all kinds of devs the best since gaming forums have been a thing, now suddenly here you come with some made up criteria, telling people they can't call anyone the best. All devs make games. Whichever one they think make the best games is who people will call the best.

Fair enough. OP makes a statement about Nintendo being the best and me and many others disagree.

Just leave it at that.

It was the method by which you disagreed that people took issue with, seemingly defining "best" as "capable of making a WRPG on the scale of Skyrim, but better" and arguing that point for pages on end, rather than clarifying terms from the outset.

I was drinking. I seem to have been more about trying to keep up with replies and not fully thinking when trying to make a point. I Only wanted to state that other devs can do things Nintendo can't. So I wouldn't consider them the best, only one of the best, which isn't a knock on them in any way.

 

I am also on my iPhone and can't cut quote trees. Sorry.