By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
adriane23 said:

"Robson testified that he believed Jackson had a "sexual interest in women," and that he had never seen "anything that suggested pedophilia" at Neverland.[56] Jackson's multiple residences were searched multiple times by multiple agencies over a period of days, without any child pornography ever being found. The FBI analyzed sixteen computers and found "nothing notable" according to their files."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Michael_Jackson#Pornography

And don't give me any BS about Wikipedia not being a credible enough source. And yes, the full portion of that Wikipedia entryu does state that they found a few questionable things in his home of a sexual nature. It also revelaed the "victim" was lying about events that occurred.

It seems to me like you latched onto "kiddy porn" (interesting choice of words by the way) a long time ago and just ignored the facts and logic for years. If there was actual child porn found in his home he would've been charged and convicted of possessing child pornography regardless of whether they could prove that he was a molester. Did you even comprehend what you wrote? Did you think that they found child pornography in his home and was like, "Aha! We caught you red handed of a crime, but we're just going to add it to the evidence for the molestation charge instead of introducing a new concrete charge of child pornography possession......Because we're morons."

Michael Jackson was a strange man and he even had questionable things in his home (if you consider homosexual things questionable in 2014), but there was no evidence that he molested children other than people saying that he did.

EDIT: Here's a little more light reading for you.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charles-thomson/one-of-the-most-shameful_b_610258.html


Kiddy porn is the most frequently used sinonim for that filth that is pedophile pornography. Also it is Wikipedia, like it or not, just because you point it out to me, it doesnt make any difference.

He was a drug addict and he had underage male modeling magazines in his house, even in his bathroom. No matter what fans believe, how the media wants to shed positive light on him, after his death, there is no denieing IMO. But hey, the fact that a carcrash of a humam being is the author shouldent distract you from enjoying his work

 

PS: Huffington Post... Here, take my badge of reliability my dear friend.



Vote the Mayor for Mayor!