oniyide said:
Naw you only got half of it right. Truth is 3rd parties were never big on Sega especially Japanese publishers which is ironic. SNES got WAY better support than Genesis did. ANd frankly this whole 3rd parties want leverage argument is just based on paranoid fanboyism. 3rd parties dont care that a first party title does better. Lets not be silly. Halo moves big numbers thats not stopping anyone from putting games on xbox. 3rd parties just want systems they can sell there games on, that simply isnt the WIi u right now. |
We'll agree to disagree. But you've only got it half right, Sega got better western support than Nintendo during those days, but the fact is because Sega, like Nintendo, had a strong first party, thirds weren't as prevalent on either console.
Paranoid fanboyism? Dude, please, I'm too old for that. I'm sure you know I've been on Nintendo fans shit list since this gen began because of my opinions on Wii U.
Again this is circular, they don't care as long as Nintendo isn't in the equation. M$ and Sony are largely interchangeable, hence why when one does well the other falters. And if thirds didn't care which first party does better, why then do they use the excuse that they can't compete with Nintendo games on Nintendo systems?
They do want leverage, especially if given a choice. Sony and M$ CANNOT survive without third parties, the best selling games on their platforms are never their own. This is a precarious position to be in as a console maker. Just ask Sega.
Bet between Slimbeast and Arius Dion about Wii sales 2009:
If the Wii sells less than 20 million in 2009 (as defined by VGC sales between week ending 3d Jan 2009 to week ending 4th Jan 2010) Slimebeast wins and get to control Arius Dion's sig for 1 month.
If the Wii sells more than 20 million in 2009 (as defined above) Arius Dion wins and gets to control Slimebeast's sig for 1 month.







