By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
impertinence said:
Max King of the Wild said:
By the way, here's Oxfords definition

A person who pretends to give an impartial endorsement of something in which they themselves have an interest.

Should we bring up Reggie's statements comparing Nintendo, Ms and Sony systems acting impartial? I assume we can agree he has an interest in the system.

Like it or not Reggie = shill

Fascinating. You prove yourself to be wrong with your own reference, yet are so pathologically incapable of admitting that you were incorrect that you ignore all common sense and logical structure to avoid having to face reality. This skill should serve you well as you progress through life...


Logical fallacies...  A sign of a failed attempt at an argument. 

 

The three definitions I provided (two of which are the most credible for dictionaries) made no distinction of a public representative of the company and like you claimed "a neutral observer" or "unbiased customer" for a shill. What you gave in those were examples. Not definitions. The only difference between one and the other is we can just easily identify one as a shill over the others. You were wrong when you tried to jump on my nuts. Just apologize already