impertinence said:
Fascinating. You prove yourself to be wrong with your own reference, yet are so pathologically incapable of admitting that you were incorrect that you ignore all common sense and logical structure to avoid having to face reality. This skill should serve you well as you progress through life... |
Logical fallacies... A sign of a failed attempt at an argument.
The three definitions I provided (two of which are the most credible for dictionaries) made no distinction of a public representative of the company and like you claimed "a neutral observer" or "unbiased customer" for a shill. What you gave in those were examples. Not definitions. The only difference between one and the other is we can just easily identify one as a shill over the others. You were wrong when you tried to jump on my nuts. Just apologize already







