Nicklesbe said:
MDMAlliance said:
| Nicklesbe said:
Skinny guys do not have "pecks" that bulge over chest belts. If she was fat or even musculer you'd have an argument. However she's clearly not, and very feminine. So at this point you are grasping at straws at best and ignoreing all the other substantial evidence.
|
That is an EXTREMELY weak argument given that you're making those "boobs" seem MUCH bigger than they are. They are barely even visible. All of your evidence is weak. Seriously. How hard is it to believe that those things you are seeing are NOT boobs? The amount of footage shown of the character up close is LITERALLY only SECONDS long, and the amount of "ANGLES" in the shot are LITERALLY only a FEW. And given that ONE of the angles actually DON'T fit with your observation is ME grasping at straws? Seriously?
|
Its a lot stronger than your argument that focuses entirly on one angle and ignores all other evidence. At least Im being realistic and looking at everything instead of being irrational.
|
No, I am considering everything. My argument is that we have no definitive evidence either way. I am not ignoring your so called "evidence." All those other angles could be a wrinkle in the shirt given that in those shots, "Link" is moving. Cloth physics probably are playing a part. Also, the lighting itself may be deceiving what you're seeing. And it's extremely subtle what you're pointing out that you can't really make ANY call on it. You're the one being irrational because ALL it takes is ONE piece to take apart another claim. AKA this is a contradiction to your statements. What you're providing isn't a contradiction to what I'm presenting because I'm not the one making the claims that the character is female/has boobs.
