Nintendo still holds legal power over GoldenEye 007

[Goddbless]

MrMarc said:

ChronotriggerJM said:
Believe in that statement all you want Mr. Marc but I've played, beaten, and loved to death that Goldeneye yes I have, and by no means does it "piss" on anything >_>; I've played plenty of shooters since then that I've enjoyed much more -_-; Hell, I enjoyed one of the 007 games that came out after Goldeneye more (grappling hook for spiderman gun-fights FTW). Goldeneye was GREAT for it's time, and if you still believe it's holding the un-precedented bar of greatness, it seems your simply unwilling to change and you'll take that opinion to the grave. Hell Perfect Dark > Goldeneye -_-;

It's not a matter of my being 'unwilling to change' because that's simply not true. Goldeneye is a timeless classic and I'd recommend anyone to play it over Crysis, Killzone, Halflife, Halo, or any other hypefest FPS titles because it still remains such fun to play today (Gotta love N64 emus with N64<>USB adaptors!) in both single and multiplayer.

You mention Perfect Dark which is definitely the subject of heated debate, but take that into perspective, if there is an FPS better than Goldeneye, it's only one of Rare's / Free Radical's own efforts: Perfect Dark or Timesplitters.

And shame on you for liking one of the EA 007 titles more than Goldeneye! That really is quite the crime indeed!

I agree with ChronotriggerJM on Perfect Dark being better than Goldeneye. That game is the reason Perfect Dark Zero was such a dissapointment. I also agree that the 007 in question was fun as hell. The grappling hooks added a whole new dimension to the gameplay, and it was fun to decapitate people with Oddjobs hat.