By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aerys said:
kirby007 said:
Aerys said:
People need to learn to make the differnece between guess and good estimation.

We saw VGC is totally wrong the previous weeks, they just guessed the numbers ( remember : Spiderman on One or Borderlands Vita vs Vita sales. )

fine 3 items over the past what ... 4 months? yes vgc is terrible...... forget all those other games and hardware

being wrong on 3 items discredits the whole database? please


If you dont understand why it discredits the whole database , i can do nothing for you. ( and they made much more than 3 mitakes, please, be honest)

 

These errors mean everythng : VGC numbers are guessess, how could they make such huge mistake if they were real estimations, they just invented numbers based on nothing, what dont you understand in this ?

Kirby summed up my thoughts against Fusioncode, so II'll talk to you instead, cause you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Do you even know how Vgchartz come up with their numbers? They do the same damn thing NPD does, just faster and less accurate. You focus on the mistakes of Vgchartz, and there are many, but you refuse to accept that for the most part they do a great job.

 

You know what, since you clearly don't know anything about Vgchartz  methods I'll try to see if I can find the text where ioi explains it all. Maybe that will make you open your eyes.

 

Edit: And here we go. Read up on the subject before talking next time.

http://www.vgchartz.com/article/82746/editorial-why-it-is-so-easy-to-blame-vgchartz/