Aerys said:
These errors mean everythng : VGC numbers are guessess, how could they make such huge mistake if they were real estimations, they just invented numbers based on nothing, what dont you understand in this ? |
Kirby summed up my thoughts against Fusioncode, so II'll talk to you instead, cause you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Do you even know how Vgchartz come up with their numbers? They do the same damn thing NPD does, just faster and less accurate. You focus on the mistakes of Vgchartz, and there are many, but you refuse to accept that for the most part they do a great job.
You know what, since you clearly don't know anything about Vgchartz methods I'll try to see if I can find the text where ioi explains it all. Maybe that will make you open your eyes.
Edit: And here we go. Read up on the subject before talking next time.
http://www.vgchartz.com/article/82746/editorial-why-it-is-so-easy-to-blame-vgchartz/







