| The Fury said: Civil War was okay, the ending of the main series was a Whedon idea, so automatically for me gets the utter bull crap opinion. However, I know the regeneration of which you speak and me and many X-men and Wolverine fans hated it, sure many thought it was cool but that's not how Wolverine's power is meant to work. It's a healing factor, not regeneration. In AoA he lost a hand and it didn't grow back. If he loses a tooth, it won't come back, if he has his heart or any other vital organ removed from his body, he can't grow a new one and survive, he's dead. But that moment, changed the idea of Wolverine. Sadly for the worse. This is one gripe I have with many comics and writers, they change basic principles of how something has always worked to fit their ideas, instead of molding their ideas arounf what they have. Recently, Bendis time travel shite, Phoenix, the way so many writers have made Xavier to be the bad guy, Danger Room AI bullcrap (Whedon in general, insulted X-men fans but some still praise him because he is Whedon), even changes to Bishop were annoying... Oh, I went off on one. Lets put it this way, character development is good, changing a character to pretend/push character development is bad. |
Vomited on my keyboard when you mentioned that. How did a first Whedon story arc turn out so awesome only to be followed up with such shite?
Anyway, I guess we're drifting off topic. We'll let others discuss the movie.
