| d21lewis said: *Edit* I'm more of a DC fan but I do love me some Marvel, too! I remember when Logan lost his adamantium (I still have the issue with the holgram on the cover!) and then his healing factor went into overload. I'd say he was more poweful. I went a while without reading comics but during Civil War, I can't think of the guy's name blew Wolverine up to the point where there was absolutely nothing left but an adamatium skeleton (as if he had adamantium ligaments and tendons). Anyway, Wolverine regenerated from THAT and back to full power. At that point, I said "Fuck this comic and this character." I got over it, though. Anyway, my point is that I think Adamantium Wolverine is more powerful than bone claw wolverine (which is so much weaker that it doesn't even get capital letters!). |
Civil War was okay, the ending of the main series was a Whedon idea, so automatically for me gets the utter bull crap opinion.
However, I know the regeneration of which you speak and me and many X-men and Wolverine fans hated it, sure many thought it was cool but that's not how Wolverine's power is meant to work. It's a healing factor, not regeneration. In AoA he lost a hand and it didn't grow back. If he loses a tooth, it won't come back, if he has his heart or any other vital organ removed from his body, he can't grow a new one and survive, he's dead. But that moment, changed the idea of Wolverine. Sadly for the worse.
This is one gripe I have with many comics and writers, they change basic principles of how something has always worked to fit their ideas, instead of molding their ideas arounf what they have. Recently, Bendis time travel shite, Phoenix, the way so many writers have made Xavier to be the bad guy, Danger Room AI bullcrap (Whedon in general, insulted X-men fans but some still praise him because he is Whedon), even changes to Bishop were annoying...
Oh, I went off on one. Lets put it this way, character development is good, changing a character to pretend/push character development is bad.
Hmm, pie.
