The Fury said:
Would they? A non-magnetic metal Wolverine would be a dang site more handy against Mags than adamantium version, and you know like I do that adamantium Wolverine is less powerful than bone version.* see edit* Good to hear another fans thoughts. Mind you, just a shame for current X-men comics we can't just use the 'time travel' excuse. It's Bendis' inability to understand basic time travel logic as the reason it so messed up/broken as feck. Thank god for Brian Wood. |
Adamantium free Wolverine still only lasted 6 seconds against Magneto in this film. I guess he's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. Non adamantium wolverine would still be useless against other threats, though. His dense bone claws couldn't even cut my steak at Waffle House....though I'm not sure his adamantium claws could cut their steak, either. Matter of fact, forget I mentioned the steak. Bad memories.
*Edit* I'm more of a DC fan but I do love me some Marvel, too! I remember when Logan lost his adamantium (I still have the issue with the holgram on the cover!) and then his healing factor went into overload. I'd say he was more poweful. I went a while without reading comics but during Civil War, I can't think of the guy's name blew Wolverine up to the point where there was absolutely nothing left but an adamatium skeleton (as if he had adamantium ligaments and tendons). Anyway, Wolverine regenerated from THAT and back to full power. At that point, I said "Fuck this comic and this character." I got over it, though. Anyway, my point is that I think Adamantium Wolverine is more powerful than bone claw wolverine (which is so much weaker that it doesn't even get capital letters!).
